Up to now, pundits have been skeptical about the possibility of a constitutional amendment protecting marriage. I think that may have just changed today. When people realize that this means same-sex couples will be visiting their churches demanding equal treatment as heterosexual couples, and same-sex couples attending their office "holiday" parties, and seeing same-sex couples in the mall, all flaunting their sexuality in front of their children, anyone who thinks this is not a good thing is going to think that it is time to stop it via action that tells the judges where they can put their activism. Let's face it - we're not Scandinavia, and people who know Scandinavia know that same-sex marriage is not marriage, and will indeed destroy the institution, which is another thing that would probably make the Unitarian Universalists happy, a religious institution which seems to be unable to admit that adultery and promiscuity are bad things.